Reflectiz vs Horizon3
Reflectiz vs. Horizon3
Offensive teams prefer Reflectiz Agentic Web Pentesting over Horizon3. Here’s why:
- 100% coverage on every corner of your web
- 10x testing capacity at the same operational cost as traditional manual pentesting, so you can test on every release
- 100,000 websites already scanned for CVEs and more to deliver the most accurate results
Trusted by security teams at
The comparison
Where Horizon3 leaves gaps on the web layer
Web app testing only launched July 2026. Least field-proven part of the platform.
No LLM in the testing loop. A deterministic rules engine, not agentic AI.
No business logic testing. A rules engine can’t reason about intent: workflow bypass, price manipulation, and privilege misuse go unchecked.
Remediation: two generic fix actions per weakness.
Built for networks and Active Directory. Client-side, privacy, and PCI risk sit outside its scope.
Even if you keep Horizon3 for network testing, your web layer stays uncovered.
Why teams choose Reflectiz over Horizon3
10+ years of web intelligence before the first scan.
A real agentic layer: browser discovery, guardrails, independent validation.
Atlas AI: context-based fixes, not generic actions.
Credit pricing that scales with usage, not a flat domain license.
One console for offensive testing plus PCI, supply chain, and privacy risk.
